Audits where your week actually goes, then returns a time-blocked daily schedule that matches your hardest work to your peak energy, plus communication boundaries and a four-week rollout.
Version 1 · 5 variables · 3 required
Fill in the values below — the customized prompt updates as you type. marks a required value.
The hats you wear and roughly how much of you each one takes, e.g. 'Product manager (50%), parent of two (30%), part-time MBA student (20%)'.
Where your hours actually go in a typical week. Rough numbers from last week's calendar beat estimates.
What specifically breaks — the work that never gets started, the hours that vanish, the boundary that keeps failing.
When you think most clearly. Leave the default if you genuinely don't know. Default: Mornings 9-11 AM
Times that cannot move: standing meetings, school runs, classes, caregiving. The schedule is built around these. Default: None
Fill in Roles and responsibilities, Current time allocation, Biggest frustrations to copy the customized prompt.
Showing all 1 public result from Claude Opus 5 on version 1.
Contributor notes: Illustrative example — not an actual model run. Written to show the shape of a good answer so the prompt can be judged before you spend a call on it. Attribution: adapted from https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts by aj-geddes, licensed MIT. Source file: https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/blob/main/prompts/personal-productivity/time-management-optimizer.md
1 public result from 1 model
Reports go to moderators and are never shown publicly.
**Where you stand today** Four years in, strong reviews, and a platform rebuild you own that lands in about five months. That last point is doing quiet work in this decision: leaving before delivery converts a headline achievement into an explanation you'll give in interviews for years. It is not decisive, but it is an asset with a maturity date. **Comparing the two** *Compensation.* The offer's base is higher, but the comparison isn't complete until you price three things: the startup's four
Weighs a job offer against your current role across pay, growth, stability and work-life balance, laying out the trade-offs objectively instead of telling you what to pick.
**The decision** Whether to spend the next quarter rewriting the billing service, or ship the three customer-facing features already committed for the same quarter — given that the team cannot credibly do both and the rewrite has no external deadline. **The three criteria that matter** 1. Reversibility — which choice is cheaper to undo in six months if it turns out wrong 2. Compounding cost — whether delay makes the work meaningfully harder or only later 3. Credibility with the people who wer
Cuts a stuck decision down to four things: what you're actually deciding, the three criteria that matter, the option those criteria pick, and one sentence of reasoning.
- **Remote work policy** applies to all salaried staff; hourly staff covered by a separate schedule - **Core hours**: 10:00-15:00 local time, during which employees must be reachable - Work outside core hours is at the employee's discretion provided **deliverable commitments** are met - **Anchor days**: teams designate up to two in-office days per week; designation is set by the team lead each quarter, not by individual request - Anchor days may be waived for **travel, caregiving, or medical nee
Compresses a document, article or set of notes into dense bullet-point notes with key terms bolded, strictly limited to what the source actually says.
**Diagnosis** Your current drafts open with three paragraphs of background, so on a phone the ask falls below the fold and the reply never comes. The fix is inversion: decision first, justification second, detail on request. **Subject line options** 1. "Approval needed by Fri: 2 extra contractor weeks, $18k" (recommended — carries the ask, the deadline and the number) 2. "Decision by Friday: extend contractors through 14 Nov" 3. "Migration timeline: one decision needed" **Draft** Subject: A
Turns a difficult email into a scannable draft with subject line options, a single clear ask, and a follow-up plan — or designs an inbox system when the problem is volume rather than one message.
Oldest first · one level of replies
Sign in to join the discussion. Share what you learned or made with this prompt.
No comments yet
Be the first to share how this prompt worked for you.