Loading prompt…
Compresses a document, article or set of notes into dense bullet-point notes with key terms bolded, strictly limited to what the source actually says.
Version 1 · 1 variable · 1 required
Fill in the values below — the customized prompt updates as you type. marks a required value.
The passage, article, document or notes to condense. Paste the full text; for long documents work one section at a time.
Fill in Text to summarize to copy the customized prompt.
Showing all 1 public result from Gemini 3.1 Pro on version 1.
Contributor notes: Illustrative example — not an actual model run. Written to show the shape of a good answer so the prompt can be judged before you spend a call on it. Attribution: from https://github.com/abilzerian/LLM-Prompt-Library by abilzerian, licensed MIT. Source file: https://github.com/abilzerian/LLM-Prompt-Library/blob/main/prompts/writing/extraction_summarization/Short%20Summary.md
1 public result from 1 model
Reports go to moderators and are never shown publicly.
**Where you stand today** Four years in, strong reviews, and a platform rebuild you own that lands in about five months. That last point is doing quiet work in this decision: leaving before delivery converts a headline achievement into an explanation you'll give in interviews for years. It is not decisive, but it is an asset with a maturity date. **Comparing the two** *Compensation.* The offer's base is higher, but the comparison isn't complete until you price three things: the startup's four
Weighs a job offer against your current role across pay, growth, stability and work-life balance, laying out the trade-offs objectively instead of telling you what to pick.
**The decision** Whether to spend the next quarter rewriting the billing service, or ship the three customer-facing features already committed for the same quarter — given that the team cannot credibly do both and the rewrite has no external deadline. **The three criteria that matter** 1. Reversibility — which choice is cheaper to undo in six months if it turns out wrong 2. Compounding cost — whether delay makes the work meaningfully harder or only later 3. Credibility with the people who wer
Cuts a stuck decision down to four things: what you're actually deciding, the three criteria that matter, the option those criteria pick, and one sentence of reasoning.
**Diagnosis** Your current drafts open with three paragraphs of background, so on a phone the ask falls below the fold and the reply never comes. The fix is inversion: decision first, justification second, detail on request. **Subject line options** 1. "Approval needed by Fri: 2 extra contractor weeks, $18k" (recommended — carries the ask, the deadline and the number) 2. "Decision by Friday: extend contractors through 14 Nov" 3. "Migration timeline: one decision needed" **Draft** Subject: A
Turns a difficult email into a scannable draft with subject line options, a single clear ask, and a follow-up plan — or designs an inbox system when the problem is volume rather than one message.
**Time Audit** | Bucket | Now | Target | Gap | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Meetings | 22 hrs | 14 hrs | -8 | | Slack + email | 12 hrs | 6 hrs | -6 | | Focused writing | 9 hrs | 16 hrs | +7 | | Unaccounted | 5 hrs | 2 hrs | -3 | Main drains: no meeting has a decline default, so every invite lands; messaging is checked continuously rather than in batches; the five unaccounted hours are almost certainly context-switching residue between back-to-back calls. **Priority Matrix** - Urgent + importa
Audits where your week actually goes, then returns a time-blocked daily schedule that matches your hardest work to your peak energy, plus communication boundaries and a four-week rollout.
CLAIM CHECK SUPPORTED - Survey ran in March - "Survey ran from 3 to 21 March" SUPPORTED - 412 responses from Team-plan customers - "412 responses from customers on the Team plan" SUPPORTED - 61% found onboarding slower than expected - "61% said onboarding took longer than expected" SUPPORTED - Nearly a fifth contacted support in week one - "18% contacted support during their first week" UNSUPPORTED - They contacted support because the setup wizard confused them - no supporting fact UNSUPPORTED
Checks a summary or draft claim by claim against a list of source facts and reports everything that was added, inferred or contradicted.
Taken together, the studies reviewed above converge on three points: structured peer feedback raises the quality of code students submit in the revision that follows, students trust feedback more when rubric criteria are visible at the moment of writing, and participation drops once feedback is ungraded. They diverge on whether the benefit survives beyond the assignment in which feedback was given, and none follows the same cohort into a later course. That is the gap this study addresses: whethe
Writes the concluding paragraph of a literature review that names the gap your study fills, then stress-tests it with the objections a sceptical reviewer would raise.
Oldest first · one level of replies
Sign in to join the discussion. Share what you learned or made with this prompt.
No comments yet
Be the first to share how this prompt worked for you.