Find unmatched citations, unused references, inconsistent author-year labels and missing bibliographic fields without inventing metadata.
No public result for version 1 yet
Version 1 · 3 variables · 3 required
Fill in the values below — the customized prompt updates as you type. marks a required value.
Manuscript passages with page or section locators. Default: Illustrative text: Earlier work (Lee, 2022) describes coordination costs. A later study (Patel, 2024) examines automation.
Bibliography entries, preserving available metadata. Default: Illustrative entries: Lee, A. (2023). Coordination costs. Journal details missing. Ng, R. (2021). Team workflows. Publisher missing.
Named style and edition or supplied house rules. Default: APA 7; flag any rule requiring confirmation rather than guessing.
Cross-check this manuscript's citations and reference list.
Manuscript excerpt: Illustrative text: Earlier work (Lee, 2022) describes coordination costs. A later study (Patel, 2024) examines automation.
Reference list: Illustrative entries: Lee, A. (2023). Coordination costs. Journal details missing.
Ng, R. (2021). Team workflows. Publisher missing.
Required style and edition: APA 7; flag any rule requiring confirmation rather than guessing.
Inventory each in-text citation and match it to a reference entry. Report unmatched citations, uncited references within the supplied scope, inconsistent author names or years, ambiguous same-author/same-year entries, and missing locators for quoted passages where required.
Return an issue table with the exact text, location, category, proposed correction and information still needed. Then provide corrected entries only when the supplied metadata supports the correction.
Do not invent titles, publication years, page numbers, DOIs or retraction status. Distinguish formatting consistency from whether a source exists or supports a claim; those require separate source verification.No public examples yet for version 1
Curated prompt only. No example output or model test is attached; model compatibility has not been verified. Default inputs are illustrative practice material; replace them with your own facts and context.
Reports go to moderators and are never shown publicly.
No public results yet
Turn reviewer comments into specific revision actions and courteous responses without claiming changes or analyses that have not been done.
No public results yet
Prioritize the main finding, section text and figures for a conference poster while preserving evidence limits and venue constraints.
No public results yet
Build a source-grounded glossary that preserves differences in definitions, assumptions and measurement across fields.
No public results yet
Translate a research question into observable events, recording fields and pilot checks that different observers can follow consistently.
No public results yet
Develop provisional codes with inclusion rules, exclusions and evidence anchors while keeping interpretation distinct from the source material.
No public results yet
Audit existing survey items, response options and branching for leading wording, measurement ambiguity and avoidable respondent burden.
Oldest first · one level of replies
Sign in to join the discussion. Share what you learned or made with this prompt.
No comments yet
Be the first to share how this prompt worked for you.