Create a timed interview guide grounded in recent behavior, with neutral questions, follow-up probes, recruitment criteria, and bias checks.
No public result for version 1 yet
Version 1 · 4 variables · 4 required
Fill in the values below — the customized prompt updates as you type. marks a required value.
The decision and behaviors the research should illuminate. Default: Understand why small-agency project managers postpone sending weekly client status updates, to decide which workflow problem to investigate next.
Who to interview, relevant experience, and reachable recruitment channels. Default: Project managers at agencies with 5-25 staff who sent at least one client update in the past month. We can recruit from current customers and a local professional group.
Available time, format, materials, and participation constraints. Default: 30-minute remote interview; no prototype to show; participants may decline recording.
Beliefs to investigate without leading participants toward them. Default: We think assembling information takes more time than writing, and that a template would help. Either assumption may be wrong.
Design a user-research interview guide for the following study.
Decision or research objective:
Understand why small-agency project managers postpone sending weekly client status updates, to decide which workflow problem to investigate next.
Participant profile and recruitment access:
Project managers at agencies with 5-25 staff who sent at least one client update in the past month. We can recruit from current customers and a local professional group.
Session length and study constraints:
30-minute remote interview; no prototype to show; participants may decline recording.
Existing assumptions to challenge:
We think assembling information takes more time than writing, and that a template would help. Either assumption may be wrong.
Start by turning the objective into two to four answerable research questions. State what interviews can illuminate and what would require observation, measurement, or a different method.
Provide:
- Recruitment and screening criteria that match the objective, including a meaningful group our current access might miss.
- A timed session outline with a brief introduction, consent and recording-choice reminder, context questions, core discussion, and closing.
- Six to eight main questions, each linked to a research question and accompanied by neutral follow-up probes. Prefer a recent concrete event, observed behavior, tradeoff, or workaround over hypothetical purchase intent.
- An assumption-check table showing the evidence that could challenge each starting belief and a question that invites that evidence.
- A short pilot checklist covering leading or double-barreled wording, jargon, question order, and session length.
Do not embed the desired answer in a question or turn the session into a product pitch. Do not assume participants represent the whole market. Suggest a note-taking structure that separates quotes, observed behavior, and researcher interpretation; do not fabricate participant answers.No public examples yet for version 1
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
Curated prompt only. No example output or model test is attached; model compatibility has not been verified. Default inputs are illustrative practice material; replace them with your own facts and context.
Reports go to moderators and are never shown publicly.
No public results yet
Turn reviewer comments into specific revision actions and courteous responses without claiming changes or analyses that have not been done.
No public results yet
Prioritize the main finding, section text and figures for a conference poster while preserving evidence limits and venue constraints.
No public results yet
Build a source-grounded glossary that preserves differences in definitions, assumptions and measurement across fields.
No public results yet
Find unmatched citations, unused references, inconsistent author-year labels and missing bibliographic fields without inventing metadata.
No public results yet
Translate a research question into observable events, recording fields and pilot checks that different observers can follow consistently.
No public results yet
Develop provisional codes with inclusion rules, exclusions and evidence anchors while keeping interpretation distinct from the source material.
Oldest first · one level of replies
Sign in to join the discussion. Share what you learned or made with this prompt.
No comments yet
Be the first to share how this prompt worked for you.