Create a consistent evidence record from a paper excerpt, preserving locators, units and distinctions between reported and missing information.
No public result for version 1 yet
Version 1 · 2 variables · 2 required
Fill in the values below — the customized prompt updates as you type. marks a required value.
Paper text with page, section or table locators. Default: Illustrative excerpt, Methods §2: 24 teams completed a four-week diary study. Results §3: median coordination time was 35 minutes per day. No comparison group or uncertainty interval is reported in this excerpt.
Fields required by the review's extraction form. Default: Study design; participants; duration; comparator; outcome definition; reported result; missing details.
Extract a factual study record from this material:
Illustrative excerpt, Methods §2: 24 teams completed a four-week diary study. Results §3: median coordination time was 35 minutes per day. No comparison group or uncertainty interval is reported in this excerpt.
Extraction fields required: Study design; participants; duration; comparator; outcome definition; reported result; missing details.
Use a table with field, extracted value, exact source locator, and uncertainty or missingness. Keep the study population, sample size, design, intervention/exposure, comparator, measurement window and outcome definitions distinct wherever present.
Transcribe reported numbers with their units, denominators and uncertainty intervals. Do not calculate missing statistics or upgrade an association to a causal effect. Separate author interpretation from measured results. Use "not reported in supplied material" when a field is absent.
List any conflicting values and the passages that conflict. End with the exact additional sections needed to complete the record. Produce an extraction record rather than a quality rating or a literature review.No public examples yet for version 1
Curated prompt only. No example output or model test is attached; model compatibility has not been verified. Default inputs are illustrative practice material; replace them with your own facts and context.
Reports go to moderators and are never shown publicly.
No public results yet
Turn reviewer comments into specific revision actions and courteous responses without claiming changes or analyses that have not been done.
No public results yet
Prioritize the main finding, section text and figures for a conference poster while preserving evidence limits and venue constraints.
No public results yet
Build a source-grounded glossary that preserves differences in definitions, assumptions and measurement across fields.
No public results yet
Find unmatched citations, unused references, inconsistent author-year labels and missing bibliographic fields without inventing metadata.
No public results yet
Translate a research question into observable events, recording fields and pilot checks that different observers can follow consistently.
No public results yet
Develop provisional codes with inclusion rules, exclusions and evidence anchors while keeping interpretation distinct from the source material.
Oldest first · one level of replies
Sign in to join the discussion. Share what you learned or made with this prompt.
No comments yet
Be the first to share how this prompt worked for you.